Browser-local worksheet
Enter your inputs
Nothing is uploaded or saved
How to use it
A short, reviewable workflow
- 01
Set criterion weights totaling 100%.
- 02
Enter proposal names and score every criterion from 1 to 5.
- 03
Review weighted totals and retain supporting evaluator notes outside this local worksheet.
Useful for
Common use cases
- RFP shortlisting
- Cross-functional bid evaluation
- Recording a transparent recommendation
Important boundary
What this result cannot decide
Publish the rubric before scoring where appropriate, manage conflicts, preserve source evidence, and apply required procurement policy independently.
Model notes
Assumptions and limitations
Assumptions
- Scores use a consistent, pre-agreed rubric.
- Higher scores are always better.
- All evaluators have access to comparable bid evidence.
Limitations
- The tool does not reconcile multiple evaluators or detect bias.
- Mandatory requirements and conflicts of interest are not managed.
- Data is not stored or shared.
Questions
Frequently asked
Should price always have the largest weight?
Not necessarily. Weights should follow the documented objectives and risk profile of the procurement.
Where are scores saved?
They are not sent or stored by this site. Copy results into your controlled procurement record if needed.